Continuity of care and information are critical when reviewing a medical record. Continuum of information, evaluations and treatments start with the initial injury and travel through the medical record. But what first started out as a nice straight line quickly becomes a bowl of spaghetti, with many nuanced twists and turns. It takes an expert’s eye and first-hand experience to follow these long , slippery strands. Here are six tips to help you avoid getting tangled up yourself: Look at each medical provider closely and on its own merit. Ask, does the information at the beginning of the record hold true at the end of the record? This is particularly important for Emergency Department records. (See earlier ED blogs). For example, is what was told to the ER triage nurse the same as what was told or documented by the physician? When a claimant or patient is seen by another provider, does the information about the injury/event/diagnosis remain constant and consistent or does it morph into something else? Think of a piece of paper torn in half. Can you line up the edges to recreate that one piece of paper? If information does not line up, then that should be a red flag for the attorney or adjuster that something — some crucial fact or piece of data — may be missing or even misrepresented. If you are reviewing an inpatient stay record, look closely at the change of shift documentation. Nurses report to other nurses when there is a shift change. Is the information documented by the receiving nurse the SAME as what had been noted earlier by the departing nurse? If not, that’s another red flag. When reviewing a diagnostic report, look at the reported diagnosis and ordering physician. Is this information consistent with other documentation? Sometimes you can determine that a new physician has been brought in on the case as that physician is the “ordering physician.” This is especially true for outpatient diagnostic studies. Remember: consistency and continuity are key. Look carefully at what the injured party is reporting/describing to each provider. Is it consistent or does it change or grow? The information should be fairly consistent and make sense in the context of the alleged event and throughout ongoing treatment documents. Follow the “Trauma Timeline” through the record. Look at timing, treatment and the associated responses. Ask, did something new or different appear long after the initial injury? If so, is it a secondary complication or truly a horse of a different color?? As you can see, this process can be daunting, especially for a non-medical person. That’s where LNC’s can help. We are used to following that slippery string of spaghetti. From receiving...